Needless to say, that the Earth’s finite resources such as oil, woods and drink water have been using up drastically. Unfortunately, it gives rise to a shortage of vital resources and knock-on-effect on an entire ecosystem. However, these problems can be tackled providing that people, as well as the authority, would take drastic measures.
To begin with, scarcity of natural resources such as oil may jeopardize producing a wide range of consumer commodities. This is because a lot of goods made of plastic, rubber have been created from derivatives of oil in labs. Furthermore, it appears to increase the cost of another significant important material such as gasoline which may put under the threat transportation system and affordability of using personal vehicles. As far as clean water and forests are concerned, they are directly responsible for soil fertility. Having been used up, they tend to cause soil erosion apart from deforestation would lead to loss of habitat and in long-term perspective extinction of biodiversity. In addition, lack of water will put in danger the whole population due to drought and hence famine that caused by decreasing quantity of drink water for watering plants and decreasing crops.
To deal successfully with complexities the government should instill a sense of the importance of being a moderate consumer. This is important because only greater awareness of the problem would mean that resources are used efficiently. In other words, industrial processes, as well as people, can reduce their consumption. For instance, manufacturing can reuse water by leading it through filtration and people may follow simple conservation rules such as taking shower instead of a bath, using full washing machines on short cycles, watering plants by collecting rainwater. What’s more, developing alternative material that managed to substitute oil and all derivatives of it. To illustrate, solar and windmills energy, material based on organic substances and others might supersede oil-power vehicles being effective driving forces.
In conclusion, rampant consumerism of essential natural resources has dire consequences for humanity with negative prolonged effects on it. The best remedy would be global awareness of problems where everyone can make a contribution to address these issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, still, well, apart from, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52661064426 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07661992414 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624649859944 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5147236861 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.058823529 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64705882353 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268013323882 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750751475401 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449484543468 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162521328874 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291344963924 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.