now a days more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face. it is a positive or a negative development?
the advancement of sophisticated technology has been seen in the field of communication way. Many a deweller is glued to their cellphone and use various social website to socialise with friends instead of personal meeting. However, it is a negative development that can have for reaching consequences.
To begin with, social media has many negative side. First and foremost, studies have shown excessive online socialization that can lead to depression, isolation, Indifference and many other health problems. Moreover, majority of people create fake profile in order to chatting other users. there are numerous intances of teenager commiting suicide after being cheated by their online friends. Furthermore, many people who are addicted to online socialization, have hardly time for talking to their family members or neighbours. They most of the time prefer to remain alone in their room. So, this effects family relationships. therefore, the warmth of relationship been taken back seat and individual to become isolated.
Next, social media friendship has lack of truthworthy love and affection. No one can expect his online friends who are living another part of the world to help us when we are in trouble. On the other hand face to face communication lead to the development of true relationship that is long lasting. Meeting with friends and nearer and dearer give us a memorable experience which boost our happiness.
To conclude, although internet has enriched our lives in many ways but if we are addicted to this, it effects our relations. So, l think people should use it but in limit because it can not take place of real relationship and online friendship is not long last.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the advancement of sophisticated technology...
^^^
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds instead of personal meeting. However, it is a negative development that can ha...
^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reaching consequences. To begin with, social media have many negative side fir...
^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e many negative side first and foremost, studies have shown excessive online soci...
^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Moreover, majority of people create fake profile in order to chatting other users...
^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... being cheated by their online friends. Furthermore many people who are addicted of online ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d alone in their room. So, this effects family relationships. therefore, the war...
^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...So, this effects family relationships. therefore, the warmth of relationship been taken ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 130, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... of this, it effects our relations. So, i think people use it but in limit becaus...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, i think, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24253731343 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95364753299 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3370216892 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.357142857 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165993930604 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530826521045 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578574258265 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924646169056 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345697015054 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.