Now a days, people throw away old things and adopt new things.
Do the disadvatages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages?
Human being always try to look for new things. In present, people buy new things and drop the old things. I think, the society who throw the old stuffs and buy a new one has many disadvantages then advantages. Because of the thrown away society some people find a job but has also a drawback of pollution. On the other hand, it is a total waste of manpower and manhours.
However, when people throw things and get a new one it affect the rate unemployment in a positive way. But there are other drawbaks of that such as it increase the envirment issue which can be bigger problem than unemployment. When people throw old stuffs abd buy new one more often then the demand of new products will increase and companies will need the more manpower and unemployment will decrease but when company produce more products then there is definitely more pollution. For example, in china product has no longevity so people often use and throw things and get a new one because of this some people get a job but the pollution is major issue for china because of the industries.
However, throwing useful things is a major waste of man-power and man-hours. Wheb people drops the things as a waste which is useful then the amount of time and calories that burnt by the people who made that thing got Complete waste. For example, in one survey by university students of cleveland state university, found that one one piece of jeans made in 15 days by 10 people but that jeans which bought by people were only for two days and trow that away because they wear for only two days. So, the manpower and manhours used to made that jeans got Completly wasted.
In conclusion, when people throw things that is useful for them then maybe the unemployment rate decrease but pollution and the wastage of manpower is also increase with that. So, people should be more aware of the thing that they throw is useless or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... try to look for new things. In present, people buy new things and drop the old t...
^^
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rawback of pollution. On the other hand, it is a total waste of manpower and manh...
^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...eople throw things and get a new one it affect the rate unemployment in a positive way...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...new one it affect the rate unemployment in a positive way. But there are other drawbaks of that s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stuffs'' or 'stuff's'?
Suggestion: stuffs'; stuff's
...han unemployment. When people throw old stuffs abd buy new one more often then the dem...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...w old stuffs abd buy new one more often then the demand of new products will increas...
^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_NNS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'more products than'?
Suggestion: more products than
... will decrease but when company produce more products then there is definitely more pollution. For...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
... but when company produce more products then there is definitely more pollution. For...
^^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... definitely more pollution. For example, in china product has no longevity so peo...
^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a because of the industries. However, throwing useful things is a major waste ...
^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t thing got Complete waste. For example, in one survey by university students of ...
^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... students of cleveland state university, found that one one piece of jeans made i...
^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: one
...cleveland state university, found that one one piece of jeans made in 15 days by 10 pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... got Completly wasted. In conclusion, when people throw things that is useful ...
^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...ion and the wastage of manpower is also increase with that. So, people should be more a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, may, so, then, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58064516129 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37196817106 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439882697947 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9655468275 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.133333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 5.01903807615 299% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226562930092 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933552563914 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655954889365 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160919424061 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599023098597 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.