Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it s morally wrong to cause animal to suffer, while othe are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
There is no denial that trials of medicines are carried out on animal in order to evaluate and guarantee its safety, becoming the norm in modern life. In this case, opinions are divided, while a group buys into the idea that it involves the ethical aspect regards to animal rights, the others take the view that is is essential to provide high-quality products. It is my firm conviction that the drug industry can not promote without these experiments,however, both views will be demontrated in this essay.
On the one hand, it is obvious that there are numerous reasons why people declare outright opposition of drug testing on animals. One of the most compelling factor is that it is immoral for animal to suffer from side effect of a new kind of medicine which bring about dire consequences to the rest of their lives. For instance, mice in laboratory have to face extreme experiments which produce the result of strange behaviours such as shiver, shocking, mental disorder or long-term pain. It is also no wonder that a burden of organizations which support animal rights provoke an outcry. They strongly request scientists to bring animal testing to halt because there is a widespread belief that animals have no fault to face hurtful consequences for human.
At the same time, there is a school of thought taking the view that animal testing is crucial because of its advantages for human being in terms of treatment and therapy for patients. The most primary reason is that animal testing is the most practical way to value the quality of drug before being consumed by patients. Needless to say, most of the cells and molecules of animals such as mice have a similar functions when compared to human, so its reaction to drug can be the same as human. Secondly, it is sensible that animals are treated unfair, however, without the sacrifice of an animal, an entire human being could suffer from disease or even pass away.
In conclusion, I am in favour of the view that animal testing can bring about a wealth of benefits to human through the development of drug industry and emergence of new medicine. For this reason, it should not be banned if scientists do not have any alternative method.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-21 | Ngoc Nguyen | 78 | view |
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional culture are incompatible. To what extentdo you agree or disagree with this view 78
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
- In the developed world, average Life expectancy is increasing.What problem will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations. 84
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain But others say films should have educational value Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reason for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...l rights, the others take the view that is is essential to provide high-quality produ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 453, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
...an not promote without these experiments,however, both views will be demontrated in this...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at there are numerous reasons why people declare outright opposition of drug test...
^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'function'?
Suggestion: function
... of animals such as mice have a similar functions when compared to human, so its reaction...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81794195251 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64991471985 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538258575198 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.4103158181 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.428571429 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0714285714 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243466844059 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805788965146 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291742413207 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144908139871 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158344580916 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.