Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new
medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people
argue that these experiments should be banned because it is
morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor
of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
With the advent of technology in the healthcare system, innovative approaches for developing effective medicines by experimenting with efficient techniques on animals are highly prevalent in our society. In this context, the school of thought that exploiting animals for human needs is unethical is opposed by many others in the favor of mankind. This essay would endeavor to shed some light on the driving thoughts behind this mentality, followed by my personal view.
To begin with, it is an irrefutable fact that the safety of human life is by far the most important act in the entire globe. So, in order to achieve this goal, doctors rely a lot on the efficacy of experimentation of new drugs on animals. Besides proving the authenticity of the newly launched medication, animals are further tested to be utilized to create some life-saving drugs. For instance, recent research on medications to beat cancer, a deadly disease, has proven bliss in the life of survivors. Hence, to mitigate the side-effects of new drugs on humans, while lowering the mortality rates due to detrimental diseases, animal testing is of immense value.
By contrast, a section of society believes that this discrimination with animals should be outlawed. As animals play a pivotal role in maintaining nature's balance, hence, an over-dependency on the same can lead to their extinction. Moreover, at moral levels, it is against our ethics to torture animals for our own self-interests. For example, while experimenting with a new medication, a severe reaction can have an intimidating effect on the chosen animal. So, it is erroneous to give unbearable pain to animals for the sake of humanity.
To conclude, although views on the use of animals for the betterment of human health vary a lot among the masses, however, in my opinion, a properly regulated balanced act by the government is highly synonymous with balancing this practice. Also, while testing on animals, efforts should be made to reduce dependency on the same using some artificial techniques.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21148036254 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03775195636 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580060422961 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3471162292 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24301651863 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758926499868 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463733339834 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140435255416 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140803907434 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.