Nowadays, Artificial intelligence is being used to drive cars.
Why is this happening?
Is this a positive or negative development?
In recent years, autonomous cars have become increasingly common. This is because Artificial Intelligence has reached a point in its technological advancement were it can safely control a vehicle. And this should definitely be viewed positively due to reduction in traffic accidents and congestion.
To begin with, cutting-edge technological development has made it possible for AI to successfully manoeuvre a car for varied reasons. First, using AI in cars allow them to be driven with more accuracy and precision. This is because they now possess unique software systems and sensors like cameras and GPS devices that help them handle complex situations. For instance, most AI machines are trained extensively in virtual simulations to help prepare a vehicle for nearly every event on the road. Furthermore, some can anticipate collisions even before they happen and as a result eliminate the proportion of catastrophic events on roads occurring from unforeseen human errors. One final point is the fact that AI now enable these vehicles to see, hear, think and make decisions like human drivers will do.
This should certainly be accepted because of enhanced protection of life and reduction in time spent commuting between places, and of course, a decline in traffic congestion. Artificially intelligent automobiles can now travel between destinations without a human operator, and so employing them in transportation would potentially reduce manmade errors while on transit. For example, the new Tesla cars produced by Google was shown to have a very high accuracy with no abnormalities recorded during its testing in 2018. Additionally, with AI completely excluding human interference, these vehicles would be able to navigate traffic easily while ensuring human safety. Thus, making them truly indispensable to long distance driving.
In conclusion, driving cars using computers is happening because modern innovations in science and technology has made it possible for AI to mimic human cognition, obviously performing what humans do with better sensitivity and specificity. This, no doubt should be welcome because it would ensure our roads are secure for lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
... point in its technological advancement were it can safely control a vehicle. And th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, of course, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54191616766 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03348973164 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640718562874 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9270960507 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6875 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21826371132 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685027964924 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545616047895 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149528470108 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586160434391 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.