Nowadays, it is more convenient and easier for people to travel to other countries. Is this a positive and negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or expericence
In recent years, along with the improvement of society, many people are motivated to explore other places all around the world. In my view, having a trip to other countries is a great way for people to be familiar with various cultures and lifestyles in each country, which can be seen as a beneficial point of people’s life.
First of all, thank to the existence of low-cost airlines, the travelling activities have increased significantly recently. It is an undeniable truth that airlines companies such as Vietnam airlines or Jetstar Pacific Airlines are providing affordable and economic tickets, so people from different ranges of income can purchase it. In other words, the stress level of people has risen when facing business competitions and pressure from financial problems. Due to this, they want to get away from it all and spend more time together with their families. Additionally, some people explore other soils to discover more details about different people and their traditions, outside and even within a country. Thus, travelling to other places can be advantageous for people to blow off some steam and have a happier life.
On the other hand, tourism is undoubtedly beneficial for many countries around the world and their citizens. To illustrate, countries like France or Australia have travel and tourism as an important part of their economy when tourism contributes significantly to the national GDP. As a result, it offers chances for inhabitants of travelling destinations to earn money and pick up careers such as travel bloggers, trip organisers or tour guides. Not only that, but their traditional values are also looked after and introduced to international friends. Therefore, many nations concentrate on improving and promoting travelling activities and create more favorable conditions for tourists.
In conclusion, it would be useful for people interested in travelling around the world to find new things about the traditions and lifestyles of new destinations. It is not only beneficial to people’s life but also it can be advantageous for countries’economies.
- Students should pay the full cost of their own university studies rather than have free higher education provided by the state 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Tourists damage many historical places making them harder to preserve What are some of the reasons for this Suggest some ways to resolve this problem Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Writ 93
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35542168675 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08784744734 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557228915663 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9408636045 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.533333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21964290263 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790143373108 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038670638558 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139546757095 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158205635869 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35542168675 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08784744734 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557228915663 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9408636045 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.533333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21964290263 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790143373108 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038670638558 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139546757095 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158205635869 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.