The architectural designs have changed massively in last few decades. People are now preferring spacious buildings for offices and schools instead of congested interiors. The popularity of this development is largely due to growing need of accommodating overpopulation. Although it is less suffocating, the disadvantage of losing privacy clearly outweighs its positives.
The main reason to implement an open plan design is to prepare for large number of individuals in future. It means the population of earth is increasing rapidly, offices and schools are likely to get overcrowded in coming years. Since architects plan buildings that could last for several decades, they design them in order to cater possible increase in head count. For example, Apple company designed their office on open plan design so that if number of employees are increased, new cubicles could be added in the office. Moreover, any ideal building should be able to cope-up with changing times so those constructed while considering future requirements can survive for years to come.
While open plan design has wider space, it significantly reduces privacy. In such design lesser partitions are added and rooms are often merged with each other. This leads to massive interruptions and background noise. For example, teachers often complaint about noise in open space classrooms because of lack of walls. This results in loss of productive work or class environment. Furthermore, In modern world, privacy is valued immensely so residents or employees often resent this deficiency.
To conclude, construction on spacious designs has become famous among real estate circles in order to cater possible escalation of population. While it reduces congestion, the loss of personal space makes it an architectural failure. So, undoubtedly, care must be taken while implementing such plan on commercial level so that adjustment of large proportion of masses does not come at the cost of their discomfort.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...d massively in last few decades. People are now preferring spacious buildings for offices and scho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...prepare for large number of individuals in future. It means the population of earth is in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46078431373 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98659378001 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5948775913 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72222222222 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143064224605 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044765677571 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339721343205 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815412680989 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323962044345 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.