It is apparent that staying with parents is considered to be a positive thing for the children in this 21 century; thus, the number of students prefer to live with their families during the time of their university study. However, some students give more priority to live in the city for their studying purpose. Further, the merits and demerits for both the situations are yet to be analyzed in the subsequent paragraphs.
Giving priority to live with family seems to be effective for the students in certain ways. Firstly, students have to spend large sums of money in terms of accommodation, food, and paying bills, thereby living in the flats and paying guest houses; therefore, staying with a family leads to lower spending of money. Secondly, spending time with parents becomes easy for students, whereby the parents can be helped by them in the household works, whereas the negatives need to be considered that come along this living, the first and foremost is an extreme dependency on the family members; meanwhile, they become lazy and irresponsible towards their responsibilities.
On the other hand, living far away from homes for doing university study links with some appropriate benefits, the first and major one is self-dependency as students become self-dependent and realize the responsibilities that are significant to perform for the survival of daily life such as financial, social interaction and many more. Besides this, having finished the lectures, they do not have to spend a long time traveling home; in the meantime, focusing on the study and rest becomes easy for them. Having said that, this living deteriorates the intimacy with family members, and therefore, the students become unable to understand the feelings of them, whether they are in sorrow or happiness.
In conclusion, both the livings have their own significance, so the students should have a similar choice for their better learning; consequently any single cannot be neglected.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22327044025 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86888465943 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.2438536517 49.4020404114 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.1 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.8 7.06120827912 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193940586725 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938431635253 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478592579444 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132016925569 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338899797635 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.