Nowadays more and more business meetings and business trainings are taking place online. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
These days the trend of online meetings and training in business is on the rise. Although there are some drawbacks to it, the benefits are considerably large. In this essay, I will shed some light on both sides.
To start with the positives, online training and meetings can be organised from any part of the world. This helps most of the multinational companies which have their headquarters in the US and various low-cost development centers in different parts of the world, and that makes it all the more necessary for them to have regular sync up call. For instance, Apple has its R&D center in US and testing in China, so if there is a critical bug found in testing, syncing up online makes it a lot easier for developers and testers on either side. Additionally, the cost of organizing an online call is significantly lower than a physical meeting or training. For example, training with a large number of participants can incur a lot of money in traveling as well as booking an auditorium.
Now with the negatives, since most of these companies are based across the globe, it can have a detrimental impact on participation. Due to the fact that they operate in different time zones, there may be a possibility that meetings or training are organized out of office hours, and it may hinder participation. To illustrate this, if there is a conference call organized from the US early morning, it will be too late for the developers sitting in Australia then they may drop out of the call.
Another factor to consider is that online calls are prone to disturbance and can deter the quality of training as well as the output of meetings. whereas training or meeting that is done physically, mostly ensures a calm and productive environment.
To conclude, online call and training have brought many positive developments for various companies that by far outweigh the drawbacks. Although the difference in time zones and susceptibility of disturbance has to be dealt with, we can not deny how much online sync up has bridged the gaps and saved costs for various institutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-29 | mona.far | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-09 | Faizan2401 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-09 | Faizan2401 | 73 | view |
- universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays more and more business meetings and business trainings are taking place online Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Nowadays more and more business meetings and business trainings are taking place online Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person s culture and character from their choice of clothes Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...or training. For example, training with a large number of participants can incur a lot of money i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...ning as well as the output of meetings. whereas training or meeting that is done physic...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, then, well, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8487394958 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87315773105 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532212885154 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.882173259 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192386034415 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687982714653 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605463615957 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107763865579 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356380391052 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.