Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is the good thing while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is true that the number of young government officials has been dominant in many recent years. While some individuals think that older politicians are much more suitable, I strongly believe that young people also have outstanding abilities to enter politics.
On the one hand, there two main reasons why many think old generations should be elected as government posts. One possible reason is that they have a wealth of invaluable experiences, either first-hand or vicarious. Therefore, they could avoid taking unwise decision, which could negatively affect national economy and other public domains. Hillary Clinton, for example, an prominently veteran politician, although lost the election to become the American President, we could not deny that her enormous experience as Minister of Foreign Affairs for decades has contributed greatly to domestic economy. Besides, those who vote for the elderly to become politicians believe that these old generations would devote entirely to politics without any influences from the heavily personal responsibility for nurturing their off-springs. Indeed, if those government officials have abundant tasks to handle, then they could not focus completely on their political activities, especially with the young women politicians. As a result, it is highly advantageous for the elderly to be engaged in politics.
On the other hand, I strongly agree with those who vote for young politicians due to the fact that they have markedly better health and innovative ideas. There is no point in denying that state officials have always been facing with massively uphill government tasks on a daily basis. If, for instance, politicians do not have excellent mental and physical health, they could not fulfil their complex tasks perfectly. Younger generation, consequently, would be suited to these tasks for their tremendously indomitable spirit. Furthermore, these young state officials often think up marvellously creative ideas, rather than maintaining the dated ones. This personal trait is of paramount importance to the sustainable development of a country, especially for the developing nations to introduce the effective policies to shake off poverty.
In conclusion, although the independence and vast knowledge could stand the elderly in good stead in election, it seems to me that younger generations should be highly voted because their innovation and physical and mental well-being.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... domains. Hillary Clinton, for example, an prominently veteran politician, althoug...
^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'bettered', 'welled'.
Suggestion: bettered; welled
...due to the fact that they have markedly better health and innovative ideas. There is n...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63858695652 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91933206481 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7750165983 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6875 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0834408000964 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297456308416 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573800618423 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722352271218 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792459159464 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.