Nowadays more and more young people hold important position in government some people think that it is good thing while other argue that it is not beneficial. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Holding highly responsible position in government is on the rise among youngsters in recent years. While some demographics of society find it worthwhile, others argue of its effectiveness. Eventhough, both the conflicting perceptions have their own valid reasons, I strongly favour this trend.
It is fairly easy to comprehend why some individuals are in harmony with this assertion. The preponderant reason is young people's are enthusiastic and zealous. They have a great vision and spirit to take forward the nation. They not only confined to convention but also willing to try new things. Secondly, youth have great knowledge about technology, by using new techniques advanced the industrial sectors as well as the Cooperative sectors; consequently, the economy of the country and infrastructure of the country get boosted. Moreover, young generation are better physically as compared to old ones. So, they enable to fulfill some tough jobs. In short, young leaders could be a source of inspiration for the youth to step forward and do something for the benefit of the country
.
Meanwhile, there are some people who criticized this ideology andMeanwhile acknowledge that it is not proper to give the reins of nation in raw hands because youngsters are impatient and lack of social experience and any of their hosty decisions may have serious consequences.Furthemore, certain people argue that sexagenarian and octogenarian have more experience and can solve the difficult station on the behalf of their earlier failures because they faced too much trouble states in their life.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, in the present scenario, It is better to let the emerging youth take the nation forward by offering them important posts in government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-18 | Gagandhillon | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 25
- The table below gives information about population of over 60 years old in regions in 2000 and the predicted numbers of population over 60 in 2050 it also show the world population over 60 in 2000 and 2050 84
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 90
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world what are the reason for this and suggest some solutions 78
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European City in 1960 1980and 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... great vision and spirit to take forward the nation. They not only confined to co...
^^
Line 3, column 788, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...omething for the benefit of the country . Meanwhile, there are some people who c...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthemore
...decisions may have serious consequences.Furthemore, certain people argue that sexagenarian...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and can solve the difficult station on the behalf of their earlier failures bec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in short, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29787234043 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14273957664 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631205673759 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 116.652013732 49.4020404114 236% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 114.923076923 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172896213709 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516100732515 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502218859806 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902206325113 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500257097331 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.