In the fast-paced world, the technological improvements have invented various methods of communication. More and more people nowadays favor connecting through these developments such as message, email, etc. This essay believes that contacting via these amenities is the best way to communicate, on the contrary, face-to-face meetups are requird for special occasions such as important gatherings, events, etc.
Since the advancement of modern technology, communicating among people have seen a noticeable change. In other words, now personnel can easily connect with their loved ones in a blink of an eye even though they remain hundreds or thousands miles away. Otherwise, it may cost a fortune to impart personally as well as a large amount of time to travel there. In this busy world, once can easily text his family and friends with the help of a smartphone and some applications. Thus, citizens around the world have come closer. To cite an example, many students studying abroad utilize messaging apps or Gmail for communicating with their parents and enjoy day-to-day conversations. Thus, it is the best way of communication.
By contrast, these features also reduce our humanitarian qualities as due to these mediums many tend to skip face-to-face conversations while living nearby. Although developed mediums for contacting are a blessing, they are not always convenient. Special get-togethers such as reunions, marriages, etc are a must join. These occasions not only increase our bonding but also boost our social skills to connect with others. Furthermore, various meetings for business or else are needed to be done in person, since there is a possibility of information leaks on online platforms. For Instance, a plot of a recent film was leaked online which declined its sale by about 60%.
In this ever-developing world, the usage of online platforms and mobile to make contact with our loved ones is the most user-oriented method. Inspite of this worthwhile development, face-to-face meetups are essential for certain occasions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, may, so, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.421875 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10529883576 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634375 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3816793277 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3888888889 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225032586996 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602957703065 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832524743855 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142248407011 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069342871936 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.