Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Is this a negative or positive development?
It is true that more and more robots are taking care of household tasks and work in today's society. In my opinion, despite a number of inconveniences, this trend should be considered as a very welcome development.
On one hand, critics of having artificial intelligence can handle all the people's workload tend to point out a combination of reasons. First and foremost, there is a worry that bartenders, bricklayers, cooks, and especially factory workers may find themselves unemployed with the rise of robot workers. For instance, manual workers are often replaced by automated machines due to their lack of accuracy which can affect the whole production line. Another compelling reason is that individuals tend to depend on robots to do almost everything in their lives so they will not have the motivation to discover or learn new skills. As a result, they end up not keeping up with the times and gradually get left behind.
On the other hand, in spite of the downsides given above, I believe that this trend should be considered as progress. The primary reason is that it helps people who hold a lot of housework chores and work at the same time, so having artificial intelligence machines to assist them with a small number of their daily tasks can reduce their time from doing meaningless work. To illustrate, the technological revolution in the home started with the introduction of labor-saving appliances such as washing machines, dishwashers, etc. Furthermore, employees can develop their knowledge and do other jobs to make a proper living while robots are getting all the work done in time.
In conclusion, I believe that although it can have a negative impact on the human workforce, robots will be a positive addition to people’s life since they can minimize the danger and reduce the time spent on tasks both in households and at work with reasonable trade-offs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ificial intelligence can handle all the peoples workload tend to point out a combinatio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...telligence machines to assist them with a small number of their daily tasks can reduce their time...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in spite of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0127388535 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87526534379 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595541401274 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4293845056 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237875997612 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774134234616 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761558802061 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160706174923 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803785987105 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.