While people used to carry on their furniture and stuff for long a period, the last decade has seen a rise in people replacing their things on the first they get especially when they are broken, rather than repairing them. This essay would analyze the fundamental reasons for this issue as well as the ill effects of such behaviors.
The phenomenon can be attributable to two principal factors. First, nonstop progress of technology industry has unfolded the possibility to introduce more advanced products to the market place each day; which would satisfy the needs of people of different preferences. Being enthusiastic about keeping up with upcoming technology, people usually prefer to experience the new equipment. Second, the enhancements in advertisements industry has led to a more well-rounded overview of individuals on the market place as well as their available choices. As a result, when a single possession of an individual breaks, he, although it might be costly, would be encouraged to experience the state of the art technology which he might be at liberty of acquiring.
The direst consequences of this issue, however, are becoming more significant. On one hand, the exorbitant prices of newly bought devices, although being of high quality, would impose crucial predicaments on the bread-winner of a family who should not only bear the burden of daily costs, but also take care of these types of extra expenses. This would stimulate families to dedicate most of their time for earning money instead of enjoying their leisure time. On the other hand, this emerging habit would bring about ill impacts on our natural resources like oil, water and wood as they are going to be utilized to excess in order to satisfy the market’s demands; which leads to irreparable damages to environment ranging from deforestation to drought
By way of conclusion, the reasons why people are following such luxury habits are varied as mentioned above and it seems that the government should take some measures to tackle this emerging problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
..., would be encouraged to experience the state of the art technology which he might be at liberty...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, well, while, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18318318318 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84238953653 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615615615616 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.52843444 49.4020404114 236% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.909090909 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2727272727 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144124295123 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472224559449 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489848178169 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894244492944 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484755691569 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.