Nowadays online shopping is extremely popular. Discuss the impact of it on the environment and on people who lost their jobs because of it.
Buying stuffs over the internet has increased the unemployment rate and environmental issues. In today’s time, ordering the packages on the websites have become ubiquitous. I agree that this activity is having a negative effect on the nature and people’s job. This essay will discuss how this practice is unhealthy for our planet and the mankind.
It is seen that purchases made online has contributed to air pollution and loss of livelihood. Firstly, plenty of vehicles leave every day to make the delivery at the doorstep which leads to emission of carbon dioxide and other poisonous gas in the atmosphere. For example, as per the statistics, approximately thousands of items are dispatched each day that means the excess number of automobiles on the road. Hence, contaminating the air, causing harm to the human beings and the other species.
Secondly, many small scale businesses have failed to compete with the emergence of modern ways of shopping. Though it has generated employment for most of the job seekers, but at meagre pay. Local shops cannot invest as much as other big enterprises to stay in the market. For instance, in India, plethora of start ups is shut within the first two years because of the entirely different marketing scheme, ultimately employed workers are laid off, in addition to that, the owners suffer a huge loss of money and hope for an impressive outcome. That is why, the unsuccessful business ventures are permanently wiped out.
In a nutshell, offline acquisition of items has been superseded by online shopping. Though It is a growing trend, the detrimental effects cannot be ignored. It has been globally accepted, and now has become common method to buy or sell a merchandise.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0985915493 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.815519027 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658450704225 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0266190452 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0760300616579 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0216846061152 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285200438369 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0389327693905 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180380894276 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.