Nowadays people want everything to be done instantly. What are its negative and positive effects?
Interestingly, we are living in an era of high speed gadgets and gizmos which make it possible to provide us with results in a fraction of a second. As a result, we have become habitual to do our work quickly and a little delay can panic us. However, this situation has come with numerous positive as well as adverse effects on overall well being of human beings.
Analysing the merits of this scenario, first of all, if people are able to complete their work quickly, they can handle multiple tasks at a given time. It saves their time and energy which could be utilised for other productive tasks. Modern equipments and use of internet has assisted them to work faster than ever before.
Moving towards the drawbacks, sometimes, when people do not get the desired results of their actions instantly, they get anxious and feel frustrated. It is commonly seen that now a days almost every work is done quickly with the help of machines and when accidentally, sometimes machine gets stuck, work gets halted. It disturbs our whole planning and continuity of the routine.
Besides this, people are forgetting the value of patience and perseverance. Technology and internet have become the central part of the lives of the young people. They want their work done with a single click on their computers or mobile phones. When this does not happen, they get extremely irritated. Furthermore, it is causing harmful psychological effects on their minds. Children today have become more impatient and violent because of such fact-paced lifestyle.
To conclude, it is imperative that we learn to tackle this instinct of quickness and develop the value of persistence and composure while doing our work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nic us. However, this situation has come with numerous positive as well as advers...
^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...el frustrated. It is commonly seen that now a days almost every work is done quickly with ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...rustrated. It is commonly seen that now a days almost every work is done quickly with ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t because of such fact-paced lifestyle. To conclude, it is imperative that we l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... To conclude, it is imperative that we learn to tackle this instinct of qui...
^^
Line 8, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onclude, it is imperative that we learn to tackle this instinct of quickness and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, while, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99647887324 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6298715671 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62323943662 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0633123825 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6875 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0916340550833 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0288148245444 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352718218176 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0447484608073 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263823826381 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.