Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
There is a quote that respect for food is respect for life. However, there seems to be evidence that the majority of modern citizens are consuming victuals from restaurants and stores in a particularly wasteful way. From my perspective, this worrisome phenomenon resulted from several causes and several actions can be taken to diminish the quantities of food which is being thrown away
To begin with, there is a variety of explanations for the wastage of foods bought from shops and eating houses. One fundamental justification is that the amount of food purchased by modern citizens is superfluous. It does not seem unreasonable to suggest that people these days have a tendency to buy more food than the actual amount they can take in. Therefore, a bunch of residuals are being dumped on a regular basis. By the way of exemplifying, numerous buffet customers with eyes are bigger than their stomach, thereby, picking up an excessive amount of food. Another reason that is worth mentioning is due to the food discount from stores with the aim of attracting the customer. Consequently, people tend to buy more food during sales and stock up on unused foods, which often end up being thrown away, in their home
Unfortunately, there is no magic bullet for this problem. Nevertheless, there are some solutions that should be taken into consideration. The first and foremost would be to raise public awareness about the importance of food through educational systems or television programmes. A straightforward but effective measure is broadcasting documents about underdeveloped nations suffered from undernourishment. In the second place, leftover foods can be collected and processed with the aim of being a meal for the miserable ones such as the poor or homeless people
In conclusion, the excessive amount of food purchased from shops and restaurants together with the discount of victuals is the major culprit of the wastage of food. Then, some effective solutions that can be taken are to raise public awareness about the value of food as well as food recycling for the poor
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, by the way, to begin with, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11403508772 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96315997216 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9048863176 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.928571429 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376671881057 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12221209898 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741953912822 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240636768446 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523148271375 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.