Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages.
The interruption of an excessive amount of artificial noises has become a matter of controversies for quite a long time and, therefore, several people these days hold the belief that strict laws on controlling the amount of noise should be imposed. Then, the adverse and advantageous impacts when enforcing such codes will be addressed in this essay
To initiate, looking at the bright sides, there is a variety of beneficial effects when promulgating laws on managing the noise a person makes. One fundamental advantage is that it can be quite valuable for the general well-being of people. It is irrefutable that personal noise is obviously the main culprit for noise pollution, which should take responsibility for several illnesses such as high intensity, distress or insomnia, to mention but a few. Hence, the regulation from the authority through the rule of law can be a straightforward and effective means of preventing noise pollution to take place in the first place. By the way of exemplifying, laws on controlling personal noise can emphasize preventing drivers from using their car horns in an arbitrary way, thereby making the majority of roadway nowadays a less noisy and irritating
Nevertheless, the advantages of enforcing laws related to noise should not be underestimated. The first and foremost hazard is that it may violate several basic rights of mankind including the freedom of expression. Consequently, a law in favour of some segment of society can become a cause of injustice for others. Furthermore, enacting laws on noisy sounds are difficult to execute in real life since the government will have to form special squads to ensure that noise levels are within the permitted limits. It does not seem unreasonable to claim that the formation of such squads is not a viable solution and can be a burden on the exchequer as well as the national budget. An illustration of this is that emergency police personnel cannot be summoned to stop a late-night party just because it has exceeded the noise limits
From these aforementioned theses, it can be concluded that enacting laws on noise pollution may diminish the effect of noise pollution on human's health. However, such laws can lead to the devastation of freedom of mankind and it allegedly hard to put into practice
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 751, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an arbitrary way" with adverb for "arbitrary"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ting drivers from using their car horns in an arbitrary way, thereby making the majority of roadway...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 847, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...way nowadays a less noisy and irritating Nevertheless, the advantages of enforcin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the freedom of expression. Consequently, a law in favour of some segment of socie...
^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...minish the effect of noise pollution on humans health. However, such laws can lead to ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, such as, as well as, by the way, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09788359788 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97669366704 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.7540959315 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.583333333 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31094491575 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101316043712 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074831638982 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18461243733 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616999601713 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.