It s generally believed that success in fields such as art and sport can only be achieved if a person has natural talent However it s sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or artist Discuss both these views and give

Essay topics:

It's generally believed that success in fields such as art and sport can only be achieved if a person has natural talent. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or artist. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Prosperity in the aesthetic or sporty occupations can never be accomplished in a straightforward way. Then, several people these days hold the belief that only people with talent is of genetic origin can achieve success in these fields. Nevertheless, many others, including me, support the idea that we can teach ordinary children to become good athletes or aesthetics

On the one hand, it is irrefutable that natural talent plays an important role in the success of one in fields related to art and sport. On fundamental explanation is that these fields depend heavily on the moment of ecstasy, which is not likely to happen without inborn abilities. To be specific, there seems to be evidence that the logical thinking of geniuses throughout history is allegedly different from the ordinaries, thereby helping these great artists to create the work of their lifetime. Regarding sportspeople, inherited talent attributed greatly to their career since it provides them with an inhuman reaction.

Nonetheless, from my perspective, natural talent is not the prerequisite to be a good sportsperson or artist. On the contrary, normal children can be taught to become marvellous in given fields. First and foremost, it is particularly significant that successfulness can only be attained when people put every possible effort into it. Therefore, as long as the children have sufficient perseverance and diligent, a desirable outcome will come to him somedays. By the way of exemplifying, several well-known athletes used to be considered as incompetent before their triumph. Furthermore, nowadays the advancements in science and technologies, together with appropriate nutrition and exercise regime, are reportedly enabled ordinary people to surpass geniuses

In conclusion, while natural talent, which is the culprit of moments of ecstasy, play an important role in one's success in art or sports occupation, an ordinary child can also be trained to be great as long as they got enough diligence and follow a suitable diet and exercises

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a straightforward way" with adverb for "straightforward"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y occupations can never be accomplished in a straightforward way. Then, several people these days hold t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s of ecstasy, play an important role in ones success in art or sports occupation, an...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, by the way, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41823899371 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0913549163 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591194968553 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.848300864 49.4020404114 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 143.583333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4166666667 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322116903896 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110074319454 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063349606878 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192764979116 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161124896031 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a straightforward way" with adverb for "straightforward"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y occupations can never be accomplished in a straightforward way. Then, several people these days hold t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s of ecstasy, play an important role in ones success in art or sports occupation, an...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, by the way, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41823899371 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0913549163 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591194968553 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.848300864 49.4020404114 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 143.583333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4166666667 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322116903896 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110074319454 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063349606878 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192764979116 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161124896031 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.