For the last decades automation has generated significant impacts in the criminal justice system in astounding ways. These days, mechanisation is being employed to invigilate the routine activities of public by virtue of surveillance cameras and mobile phone tracking. Although many folks usually remain unconscious about recording, keeping an eye on citizens adopting technology is progressing. Personally, i believe that the benefits prevail drawbacks and this essay will support my opinion with relevant examples.
On the one hand, critics of spying technology insist that the violation of privacy rights of residents and people is the major inconvenience of security cameras. For illustration, since this type of photographic equipment snaps pictures of anything in their path with precise date and time, someone can gather a cache of images of folks going about their daily routines just as commuting schedule, the number of children going to schools and so on. Not only would the technology invade confidentiality but also it would pose dire threats. Next, likewise, the cell phone tracking, which remains one of the true blessings of modern science, is also extremely invasive because the authority could know every fact of the person like if he crossed the path, spent time with his lover and visited bars.
On the other hand, i strongly believe that the advantages easily outweigh the weaknesses in spite of the privacy issue. Firstly, surveillance cameras can deter crimes significantly for it records the identities and illegal activities of criminals that would subsequently convince the offenders to think twice before displaying anti social behaviours. Secondly, such detective mechanisation can combat heinous crimes too because the recordings form a solid basis of evidence in the court. The technology mirrors the approach of wireless phone tracking, which would also solve dreadful sins effectively. This can be exemplified by the fact that the Baltimore's police used digital phone tracking in 176 homicide cases, 118 shootings and 47 rapes in the year 2008 efficiently. This ascertains why the applied science looks particularly striking in cracking grave conducts.
In conclusion, presumably, gains such as a marked reduction and complete control of evil behaviours readily make up for the above mentioned shortcomings; however, the difficulties can be surmounted provided that the regime imposed harsh punishments for the owners who would abuse the device.
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
Don't necessarily always use cellphone tracking and security cameras as examples.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 380 350
No. of Characters: 2060 1500
No. of Different Words: 249 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.415 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.421 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.861 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 157 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 131 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 92 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.181 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.294 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.5 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.033 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'decades'' or 'decade's'?
Suggestion: decades'; decade's
For the last decades automation has generated significant im...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... technology is progressing. Personally, i believe that the benefits prevail drawb...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, look, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55526315789 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93030185733 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663157894737 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.187612134 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.733333333 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131957017762 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385444829974 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365872203582 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720882529669 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00975095825259 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.