Some people opine that news related to various issues and emergencies is detrimental to viewers or readers and to society. I partly agree with this opinion because I admit that these news media have negative effects on people's mental state. However, I also accept that they would reduce damage from natural phenomena and equip people with preventative measures.
On the one hand, the main reason why I believe that news about negative aspects of society does more harm than good is because they have an adverse impact on individual perception. For example, the news about terrorism and war has become so common in the media that some people are likely to hesitate to travel abroad for fear of a terrorist attack. Additionally, overwhelming coverage of bad news motivates people to misunderstand society's problems. For example, 14Channel has always focussed on exploiting the scandals of celebrities which was inadequate evidence, can mislead the public into believing in the flaws of the Vietnamese showbiz.
On the other hand, there are still some reasons why I support the notion that focussing on negative issues and emergencies might be advantageous in some way. Firstly, the media often reports the emergent news would minimize the loss from natural disasters. When residents, especially people being in danger are pre-informed about storm attacks or earthquakes, they can take corresponding actions to stay safe. Secondly, inhabitants would be cautious to protect themselves from crime or murderer. They do not walk alone late at night on the dark streets or they are aware of meticulously locking all their doors and windows before leaving home.
In conclusion, media reports on problems and emergencies can be informative for those who might be concerned, but the disadvantages are much stronger if the media focus too much on reporting those stories. Given this situation, producers of the news are recommended to modify the contents of the news so that it becomes more educational.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.240625 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81631512075 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60625 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4631887329 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.785714286 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184530580231 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059131895409 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445094074152 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109063385392 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00918747823162 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.