There have been some changes in the way people communicate with others due to technology. It also influences the types of relationships people make. In my opinion, this change has become more and more negative.
Technology has affected communication between people in various ways. It has offered people a variety of choices to interact with each other without leaving their houses. They only need to afford a smartphone and wifi modem to text, call, video call to their all day. Because of this convenience, a lot of people have online friends, the only thing they know is the names of those online friends. Technology gives people a kind of relationship in which people use letters more than words.
To me, it is such a negative development. This kind of relationship gradually kills peoples' abilities to talk and communicating face to face. Many people can be talkative on the Internet. But they seem to be mute in real life. Moreover, it has made millions of children all over the world less active, energetic. For example, technology has made my friend a lazy girl who only wants to lie on the bed and text, call with her online friends all day. Making online friends also contains some risks. Such as kidnapping, a large number of younger have by complicated tricks of online friends. Finally, I think this kind of relationship also harms our health, such as nearsighted, backpain.
Although technology is useful and essential, we should know that the face to face communication is much more valuable. All of us need to be able to exploit its benefits and avoid its harm and remember that we live in reality, not on the Internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ontains some risks. Such as kidnapping, a large number of younger have by complicated tricks of o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, so, for example, i think, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83274021352 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73438859562 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572953736655 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6496626132 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.4736842105 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7894736842 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324849956533 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949965838887 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090530073921 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194221898285 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117535032793 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.