Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive and negative development?
There is no doubt that the advancement of technology has markedly influenced the interaction among people. The effects and my preference for its benefits will be outlined in the following essay.
To begin with, technology has a significant impact on relationships especially involved in education and social life. First of all, the existence of smartphones and the global connection of the Internet allow businessmen to have online meetings everywhere in case of emergency, frequently even in flights due to their hectic schedules. What is more, technology revolutionized our way of making new relationships. Facebook or Instagram, for instance, link up fresh associations who desire to share common interests through technological devices instead of face-to-face meetings as usual.
In my perspective, even though this transformation certainly obtains several drawbacks, its positive side seems to outweigh these converse. In the beginning, as is visible during the severe consequence of Coronavirus, which means students are in quarantine, hence it is impossible to study at schools. Consequently, the appearance of familiar applications such as Microsoft Teams, Zoom or Google meet service pupils a lot to still keep in touch with teachers with e-learning lessons. Moreover, cooperation among countries has recently become more advantageous since writing letters or spending a long time commuting to reach the meeting’s destination are commonly replaced by using video calls.
Overall, the enhancement of technology obviously affects various means of communication, specifically in working, studying, and daily society. it definitely acquires numerous pitfalls, yet, its vital assistance aspects cannot be concerned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...n working, studying, and daily society. it definitely acquires numerous pitfalls, ...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istance aspects cannot be concerned.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, no doubt, such as, first of all, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93625498008 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31376882004 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.741035856574 0.561755894193 132% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4553352204 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166344205219 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057374590303 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659130087724 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829251168075 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040296359036 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.