Technology is the most important thing in our lives when considering various kinds of relationships. Society have changed the form of reactions to each other because of facilities in modern technology.
Evidently, technology is becoming popular on purpose within various levels of people such as businessmen, researchers, professional workers as well as civilians to fulfil their own requirements. As the first example, business partners can arrange conferences without meeting physically. They have an opportunity to utilize telecommunication technology to conduct meetings with their other members. As the second example, it has easier ways and more prompt to send and receive data than comparing to other methods to keep relationships close. If one of family member who is living far away from his loved ones, and he wants to send message to his parents. In this case he could use Skype, WhatsApp or messenger except sending letters hence those methods are quick.
However, this technique has advantages and disadvantages as well for humans. It is mainly affected to family relationships due to a number of aspects. Prior to 20th century, people used to physically spend time with each other. They shared foods, played games together, met face to face and spent memorable moments together. But now, those experiences dropped because the upgrades of computers and other technology related equipments. This also happens with the bond of friends. People do not have time to visit own friends since they are busy with work life. So that they suppose to connect by using mobile phone but it is not practical to keep a strong and success relationship.
In conclusion, my point of view, though technology has affected to every human, people used to familiar with it and have changed their way to keep communication according to the technology. This is beneficial for people in many ways but it may be gloomy based on person’s purpose.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22435897436 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92711568714 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628205128205 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8096538599 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5555555556 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326929956764 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864899283006 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645256339995 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194386782497 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640764636153 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.