There are two views regarding talent which can gain from training or a number of people have that as a natural skill through the various kind of areas such as sport, art and music.
It is clear that education can build a talented man in a specific area even though he is not born with that capacity. It can be proved with school education system owing to the fact that, in schools there are variety of subjects and children shows skills in various subject areas on the contrary it is not an equal ability within each and every child. Teachers can recognize that skill and show the future path to students in order to improve their skills set.
However, a number of people show their talent since when they bore. a number of kinds of reason for that and one is their genes. Sometimes parents have that talent consequently which should be the cause for him. Those kinds of people also ought to improve their strength from a proper guidance. Other than that, they tend to choose another talent even though they already have a particular natural talent owing to the fact that they do not need to depend on one power or would prefer to change their path. As example, there are well-known doctors who can sing extremely well when comparing with professional in music industry in contrast they do not emphasize that talent and give the priority to his career as a doctor.
Whatever talent which come from naturally or by teaching, it should be practice to improve. In order to practice those skills, there must be a suitable guidance system for anyone.
In conclusion, I agree that any child can build their talent while improving skills according to that talent through the training, on the contrary essential thing is to be really expert in that particular field, there should be some natural skills as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...show their talent since when they bore. a number of kinds of reason for that and ...
^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'practiced'?
Suggestion: practiced
... naturally or by teaching, it should be practice to improve. In order to practice those ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, really, regarding, so, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7106918239 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28841816966 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518867924528 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4920113616 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.230769231 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216194825227 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789140717384 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039982781956 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120748155116 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189149237596 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.