There are two views regarding talent in certain areas. Commonly believe that talent come from naturally while some people think it should be gain from training and it can create a experts in that particular field such as a great singer or a talented sportsmen.
It is clear that education can build a talented man in a specific area even though he is not born with that capacity. For instance, school education provides opportunities for children to be a skill full person. Owing to the fact , in schools there are variety of subjects and children shows skills in various subject areas on the contrary it is not an equal ability within each and every child. Teachers can recognize that skill and show the future path to students in order to improve their skills set.
However, a number of people show their talent since when they bore. A number of reasons for that and one is their genes. Sometimes parents have that talent consequently which should be the cause for him. Those kinds of people also ought to improve their strength from a proper guidance. Other than that, they tend to choose another talent even though they already have a particular natural talent owing to the fact that they do not need to depend on one power or would prefer to change their path. As example, there are well-known doctors who can sing extremely well when comparing with professional in music industry in contrast they do not emphasize that talent and give the priority to his career as a doctor.
In conclusion, whatever talent which is come from naturally or by teaching, it should be practiced to improve. In order to practice those skills, there must be a suitable guidance system for anyone. My opinion is that any person can build their talent while improving skills according to that talent through the training, on the contrary essential thing is to be really expert in that particular field, there should be some natural skills as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gained'?
Suggestion: gained
...ly while some people think it should be gain from training and it can create a exper...
^^^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...be gain from training and it can create a experts in that particular field such a...
^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a expert' or simply 'experts'?
Suggestion: a expert; experts
...be gain from training and it can create a experts in that particular field such as a grea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'sportsman'?
Suggestion: sportsman
...ld such as a great singer or a talented sportsmen. It is clear that education can build ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e a skill full person. Owing to the fact , in schools there are variety of subject...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, really, regarding, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78443113772 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41168537148 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532934131737 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4695377502 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.533333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233372016605 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830804464106 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433659123866 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143903275458 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0114296547644 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.