Nowadays the way people intreract with each other has changed because of technology. In what way has technology affected the types of relationships people make. Has this become a positive or negative development.
There is no doubt that many things had changed in the last few decades ; some changes are
Betterment and some others are for worse. One of the fields which were greatly affected by the advent of technology is the way of interaction and communication.
There are many feature prove with the change of the method people communicate with others. First of all, technology has opened up more ways for all of us to communicate with others. And the great things about all of any option to interact with is that we can choose what’s best for our needs without being tied down to just one method. The others feature is that nowadays video chat is one of the most popular interaction method on the whole world, which means that we can easily to talk with our friend and family without worrying both distance and not seeing the face of them. For instance, Skype is one of the most popular ways for personal and professional video communication, and it’s free for all of skype member to talk, share information.
It may be true that the development of internet can create a negative aspect for the way people interact with others people. First, people may spend their times calling and messaging and disrupt face-to-face conversation, which can decline the relationship between them and their friends or relatives. Secondly, It is easy to disseminate false information online in order to ruin someone reputation, so many people in some community easily become offensive without scaring anything because of the veil of anonimity. Take Vietnamese football player as a particular concept. The criticism for them at online is a common thing when they have a poor result in field and they don’t care about the hidden factor of these football player.
However, both variety option and video chat can be the result of the technological improvement to any people. Personally, I believe that most individuals will occur some drawbacks for themselves if they spend too much time to the internet
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the last few decades ; some changes are Betterment and some others are for worse...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... way of interaction and communication. There are many feature prove with the ch...
^^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun feature seems to be countable; consider using: 'many features'.
Suggestion: many features
...action and communication. There are many feature prove with the change of the method peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'features'?
Suggestion: features
...n and communication. There are many feature prove with the change of the method peo...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 710, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this football' or 'these footballs'?
Suggestion: this football; these footballs
...y don’t care about the hidden factor of these football player. However, both variety option...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey spend too much time to the internet
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, no doubt, first of all, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95820895522 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66884477374 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561194029851 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1833233916 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220890261398 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07882118785 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686151230893 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112546555057 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544522868385 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.