Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
In this concurrent world, for the purpose of uplifting the living standard, we are using forefront technologies that are liable for creating a progressive amount of garbage. This essay will explore the major reason for humankind being exploited to such garbage and offer the best solution the governments can come up with to resolve this flaming issue.
Humans have the tendency to evolve and furnish their living standard however they are unable to acknowledge in time about the consequences faced by the products produced by them; this including. improper disposal method is the primary concern for rubbish to be in large. Mostly plastics is the element which is essential to produce almost every material that we interact with; such as electronic devices and gadgets, furniture's and fixtures, vehicles, medicational supplies and so on which after a certain time of consumption turns into waste that cannot be disposed of. Moreover, all these materials are not recycled accordingly which produces millions of tons of undegradable waste. For instance, according to the recent study by Environment control plastic rubbish contributes to the world's largest waste (90%) followed by electronic waste (85%). Thus, the overuse of plastic materials with unreliable research-based recycling method is the major reason for cumulating the imperishable waste.
It is impossible to shut down the industries at once nevertheless the outdated machines can be replaced by the modern and scientific approach that can minimize such waste. Most importantly, governments and private sectors must fund the research which can contribute to the discovery of such advance method. Likewise, an eco-friendly policy should be adopted by the developed country like France which has minimized the use of plastic waste and positioned its name as the first pure eco-friendly country of the globe. Also, the reduction of the rubbish produced is only possible if new research on recycling waste is carried out. For example, research conducted by the student of Manchester University was able to discover bacteria that can convert plastic waste to disposable ones, though it takes hours to dispose of handful of the waste it is a scientific breakthrough. Thereafter, such research should be prioritized more in number.
In conclusion, in the name of evolution and sustainable living standard waste are increasing rapidly with increase in demand of non-recyclable products and the way to stop the blazing issue is to formulate eco-friendly policy to minimize the waste. Furthermore, the ground-breaking scientific invention is the must to manage the accumulated waste.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Improper
...ducts produced by them; this including. improper disposal method is the primary concern ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 789, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the largest'.
Suggestion: worlds the largest
...trol plastic rubbish contributes to the worlds largest waste 90% followed by electronic waste ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...nd-breaking scientific invention is the must to manage the accumulated waste.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46210268949 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99393120857 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564792176039 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.13350809 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.625 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5625 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13107926319 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460676434869 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338208668216 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728561233848 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421305478366 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.