Nowadays young prefer to move to big cities Older people however are the opposite and prefer to stay in the countryside What are positive and negative of this trend

Old people and younger generation have different taste of living. In recent times, the young people are likely to live in metropolitan cities, but the older people prefer to stay in countryside. The changing trend of living preferences for younger and older generations have several positives and negatives.
Firstly, the city life is enabling the better standard of living and career exposure for young. The transportation facilities, the access of schools and universities and advanced healthcare systems are available in urban areas. There factors are improvising the quality of city life. Most if the companies are in cities that creates a provision for tremendous job opportunities that leads to professional advancement to younger generation. For example, IT hubs, and industrial centres are located in urban areas. So the young professionals can easily find job from there and have a opportunity to build there career.

On the other hand, the old people is always want to live a peaceful retire life. So they prefers country side life that they can live in a calm and quiet place. The opportunity to interact with peer groups and space for group games are the attraction of rural areas. They can feel the beauty of environment in country side.

However, the increasing rate of migration to metropolitan towns a resting overcrowd issues and under development in countryside. The more migration leads to a damage to environmental issues that creates health problems to people living in cities.The same time, the country side is not developing because of lower population level and lack of skilled younger people.

To conclude, the city life is always attracting youngsters. In the days, the younger generation is more interested to relocate to cities whereas the old generation prefer to stay in countryside. The big cities are offering better standard of living for youth and country side is providing pollution free environment to olden generation.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (9 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oung. The transportation facilities, the access of schools and universities and a...
^^
Line 2, column 581, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...can easily find job from there and have a opportunity to build there career. O...
^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'wanted'.
Suggestion: wanted
...he other hand, the old people is always want to live a peaceful retire life. So they...
^^^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'prefer'
Suggestion: prefer
...to live a peaceful retire life. So they prefers country side life that they can live in...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 158, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'damage'.
Suggestion: damage
...ountryside. The more migration leads to a damage to environmental issues that creates he...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...lth problems to people living in cities.The same time, the country side is not deve...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, whereas, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28115015974 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92968981355 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507987220447 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 14.0 2.52805611222 554% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8637410372 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181646210052 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591008412024 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701672462857 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107447243641 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895255491619 0.056905535591 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.