Increased global power requirement can be met by using nuclear power. I personally agree with this perspective on account of sustainability and zero environmental damage.
The materials used to produce nuclear energy such as Uranium and Plutonium are easily found in abundance in the earth. In other words, it is highly unlikely that people run out of these raw materials although they extract them regularly from the ground. In contrast, non-renewable energy resources, such as coal, fossil fuel and petroleum, are scarce, therefore, we cannot solely depend on them in the future. Moreover, renewable energy, such as biomass energy, geothermal energy, solar and wind power, is not reliable due to seasonal and even daily changes. Thereby the sustainability is highest in nuclear power so that world can reliably rely on this option.
In addition to the sustainability, nuclear reactors produce clean or low-carbon energy, which is the fact that makes the nuclear power environmentally friendly. In contrast to coal power plants, nuclear power stations do not emit greenhouse gases, which are responsible for the climate change. Were people to build more nuclear reactors, environmental pollution can be minimized. This is supported by a recent study conducted at Oxford University in which they claim that air pollution would be reduced by 75% if all countries switched to nuclear power.
In conclusion, nuclear power generation is a better alternative choice in order to supply world’s increasing demand for energy. Abundance of resources is a positive fact about this option, while production of clean-energy is the best thing about it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[2]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: Where; We
...are responsible for the climate change. Were people to build more nuclear reactors, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43968871595 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97877648678 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634241245136 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1665285993 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.538461538 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173887669547 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648542618544 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678338338836 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115448873315 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561392643448 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.