Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree?
Over the past few decades, the world has seen an alarming increase in the demand for energy consumption. However, as over-dependence on fossil fuels, especially coal power, poses a dire threat to the natural environment, we need to look for other categories of energy to replace it. In my opinion, nuclear power is not the most suitable choice to meet this demand mainly owing to its potentially disastrous consequences.
There are two main reasons why using nuclear energy carries a certain degree of risk to the local community along with surrounding habitat. First of all, given that there is only a small inconsiderate action, it still leads to a failure to comply with the safety procedure, and thereby a tremendous accident. This catastrophic incident takes a heavy toll on not only the surrounding ecosystem but also the health of local residents. Secondly, to build an entire nuclear power system, we need to meet certain requirements to ensure the safety, which is inevitably expensive and may cost a huge amount of national budget. Therefore, it can be concluded that nuclear power is a risky and extravagant choice.
Instead of promoting the idea of converting nuclear power into electricity, we should take renewable resources into account. To take solar power as a typical example. Thanks to the advent of modern technology, there are a variety of breakthrough inventions to optimize an almost unlimited source of solar energy. On top of that, unlike nuclear energy, solar power is explicitly environmentally friendly and does not have any hidden dangers to human life.
On the whole, yet nuclear power stations produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions in comparison with fossil fuels, but there are a number of better remedies to address the growing energy consumption worldwide, particularly renewable resources.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, first of all, in my opinion, on the whole, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26962457338 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95621068029 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627986348123 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4554914487 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.769230769 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222425164794 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677169315224 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672536274992 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126014916178 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849251820154 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.