In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The transportation infrastructure of a country is very important. It is the essential part to make sure every activity of trading and working possible. In order to keep up and improve the system, a really large sum of money is needed. While some people think the government should improve the train routes for the new express trains between cities, there are good reasons why public transport should be considered as an important matter.
On one side, express trains should become one of the important ways of transportation in most countries. Express trains are the very high-speed trains that can reach a destination within hours, even minutes. Furthermore, it enables the ability to carry a large number of people and cargoes in a cheap, effective way. The cost to run a train system when compared to other types of public transport such as airplanes is relatively lower, so not only the government can use the saved cost to run and support other works, but also the operator and the residents can cut down the money need to be paid. Looking at an example, Singapore is a developed country, and the cost for a normal day to live is really high. Though, the cost to buy a single-trip ticket from the North to the South side of this nation is less than 1 Singapore Dollar. If we get there by taxi, the cost will be ten or twenty times higher.
On the other side, express lines are important, but not the most important. High-speed trains can only works if the length of the trip is far enough, or else the ratio of effectiveness to cost will be off. For a short trip, buses and taxis appears to be better due to convenient and price. Moreover, there are so many routes that even the really high-speed trains can’t do, especially the routes between 2 different continents or the Transatlantic route. Surely we can go to France from Russia by railway, but trains can’t show any advantages to beat airlines. They can’t be as fast as the metal bird, therefore the required time to travel long-haul is way more higher.
In conclusion, there are many good reasons both for and against. From my point of view, trains are important, but not the most, and the source of finance to maintain and develop each transportation system should be distributed equally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ermore, it enables the ability to carry a large number of people and cargoes in a cheap, effectiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or a normal day to live is really high. Though, the cost to buy a single-trip ticket f...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 673, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...equired time to travel long-haul is way more higher. In conclusion, there are many good...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, really, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76202531646 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69530977078 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53164556962 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8476092751 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274134003272 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753833621355 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679095628197 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176891088209 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094546079741 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.