In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
The significance of railway line which was always debatable have now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others disagree. However, a small number of individuals believe that it is essential to provide a huge amount of money on building new train lines which for super speed in cities while others feel that authorities should be consumed on developing increasing public transport for few countries. In my opinion, money should be used on railway service. This essay will elaborate both aspects.
in the looming paragraphs.
To begin with, nowadays governments from some countries are focusing on train service to ensure as faster transport than others through using countless money. Besides, it has more facilities to make new railway line and people can receive more benefits. To take an example, if a train gives service with super speed, it will consume time rather than others along with it will more inexpensive for everyone. For instance, Bangladesh government has built first electronic metro rail which is faster than bus, taxi, car, and individuals can time through avoiding traffic jam as well the rent price also more affordable for every kind of people. Hence, governments should be concerned to enlarge railway service via using money.
On the other hand, many people assume that public transport also require significant amount to develop. For example, if passengers obtain better facilities from public transport such as bus, taxi, tram, everyone will use them easily. Moreover, many poor are unable to pay train fair, for that reason, they always prefer bus service. which in very reasonable. Therefore, every government should be focused on public transportation system beside train line to reduce cost.
To sum up, according to the arguments mentioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of railway service are instrumentally indeed, However, governments should be taken steps to increase train line.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...eficial while others disagree. However, a small number of individuals believe that it is essentia...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...his essay will elaborate both aspects. in the looming paragraphs. To begin wit...
^^
Line 6, column 334, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...reason, they always prefer bus service. which in very reasonable. Therefore, every go...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 334, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...reason, they always prefer bus service. which in very reasonable. Therefore, every go...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34713375796 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67416003481 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582802547771 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.7016115143 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4375 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316675524884 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102226256791 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694024678732 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155521061432 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993511434707 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.