Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case
? Do you think is a positive or negative development?
The significance of smartphone, which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others disagree. In my opinion, using smartphones for children more is a negative improvement. However, a number of children depend on modern mobile phones for long time in - every day. This essay will elaborate the reasons attributing this trend along with examples in the looming paragraphs.
To begin with, nowadays few children are interesting on mobile phones instead of passing time with toys as well as parents. To take an example, many parents live in a life to develop career. As a result, unable to give enough time to own child in play and study time and babies are finding modern technology as friend. However, at present, many play grounds filled up by large building and cannot play with more friends in fields frequently. For example, a survey done by a sports association in 2018 in Bangladesh, there are no empty playground for children in cities. Thus, it is clearly mentioned above that these show in society.
On the other hand, this situation destroys present improvement in a country as in a family through rising. some problems. Firstly, it would be affected on a family to ruin a nice relationship between parents and child a far relationship and gradually the child will not have any interest on father or mother, Secondly, many are getting chubby due to less activities and are facing several diseases such as diabetes, heart blocking, anxiety and so on. Besides, they suffering from less concentration on study for focusing on smartphones continuously. Therefore, there are many effects for children depending on
Mobile phone.
In conclusion, according to the arguments mentioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the problems of smartphones are instrumental indeed too dire to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...uently. For example, a survey done by a sports association in 2018 in Bangladesh, ther...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'playgrounds'?
Suggestion: playgrounds
... 2018 in Bangladesh, there are no empty playground for children in cities. Thus, it is cle...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... country as in a family through rising. some problems. Firstly, it would be affected...
^^^^
Line 6, column 351, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun activities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...econdly, many are getting chubby due to less activities and are facing several disea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16721311475 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88756513012 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622950819672 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0859998411 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.066666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6 7.06120827912 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116994406806 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430684029613 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426384974657 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681547244486 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451692994984 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.