With the advance of high-speed railway technology, people in some countries argue that spending a large amount of money on constructing such railways between cities is necessary. However, others disagree and believe that the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
The main reason for endorsing the construction of high-speed railways between cities is that the economy could be boosted by more efficient long-haul cargo transport and leisure traveling. In many industrialized cities, factories need raw materials from distant regions to operate. With the help of high-speed railways, the productivity of local industries would be significantly improved. Similarly, for tourist cities that rely heavily on the revenue from the service sector, such railways may encourage more visitors to travel there. As a result, the unemployment rate could be reduced and the local residents' standard of living could be improved. However, building high-speed railways is a costly and time-consuming project, which may put pressure on the local government and taxpayers.
On the other hand, existing public transport plays an important role in urban commuting and should not be ignored. Many city dwellers rely on public transport like buses and subway to go to work or school, while public transport facilities in some cities are out-dated and need refurbishment. By spending money on improving the existing transport system, people can benefit from enhanced mobility and less traffic congestion. In addition, the project on improving public transport is cheaper and requires less time to finish. People can witness the improvement of public transport in a nearer future, compared with constructing new railways.
In my opinion, while building high-speed railways can benefit industrialized and tourist cities in some aspects, existing public transport is also important for city residents. The public money should be spent fairly on both types of programs and decisions should be made based on the actual situations of different cities.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, similarly, so, well, while, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61093247588 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92242806732 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527331189711 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9913249511 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393154361709 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137270782763 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102228003747 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287042410348 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133722411315 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, similarly, so, well, while, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61093247588 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92242806732 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527331189711 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9913249511 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393154361709 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137270782763 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102228003747 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287042410348 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133722411315 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.