There is an argument whether a country government should use huge amount of money to build new railway lines for rapid train or to upgrade the current public transportation. I completely agree with the latter that the money should be used for bettering the current public transportation.
On the one side, some people believe that spending money to establish railway lines for rapid train is essential, because it can support more rapid trains to operate. If there are more rapid trains that operate, the traffic congestion problem will be overcome faster because people will choose rapid train over their personal transportations. However, because of the cost of developing rapid train and its railways are expensive, citizens will most likely being charged with high-priced fare. As a result, citizens will still choose their personal transportations over rapid train and the traffic congestion problem will not be solved.
On the other side, some people opine that using money to improving the current public transportations is better than spending it for rapid train. This is because, the price of current public transportations such as bus and MRT are more affordable if compared to the price of riding a rapid train. Thus, improving the public transportations to help to solve the traffic congestion problem because citizens will not be charged with overly expensive fare. As a result, they will most likely to switch from their personal transportations to public transportations and the traffic congestion problem will be gradually overcome.
In conclusion, I completely agree that a huge number of money should be used for upgrading current public transportations, because the fare to ride current public transportations (such as bus and MRT) are more affordable than the price to ride rapid train, so citizens will most likely be willing to switch from their personal transportations which will overcome the traffic congestion problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37133550489 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02364008917 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.407166123779 0.561755894193 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5449859403 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.909090909 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252999002044 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13748144962 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813605747454 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192104084776 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409605576263 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.