It is often believed that governments should use money on railways than on roads. I completely agree with the view because of several reasons.
Firstly, using money on constructing more railways will support more trains to operate. The more trains that operate, the more trains route that will be available for people. If trains can reach almost all of people's destined routes, people will be able to travel easily and fast without having to ride their own private transportation. For instance, in Singapore, the Mass Rapid Train (MRT) have reached almost all of available areas in Singapore. All of them are also in the same connected network which ease people to travel from one place to another place without facing much difficulty.
Secondly, using money on bettering existing railways will provide safer track for subway trains and city trains to pass through. If the safety of riding trains is guaranteed, people will more likely to be interested in riding them. The more people that choose subway trains over their private vehicles, the less traffic congestion will occur. For example, in Austria, train railways are known as safe and comfortable which made riding trains becomes people's choice. As a result, Austria is known as one of the country that has least traffic congestion.
In conclusion, I completely agree that government should spend money on railways than on roads because using money on constructing more railways will support more subway trains to operate, and using money on bettering existing railways will provide safer track for subway trains and city trains to pass through, which will encourage people to ride them instead of ride their own vehicles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'operating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: operating
... more railways will support more trains to operate. The more trains that operate, the more...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te that will be available for people. If trains can reach almost all of peoples d...
^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the least'.
Suggestion: has the least
...ria is known as one of the country that has least traffic congestion. In conclusion, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'operating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: operating
...ailways will support more subway trains to operate, and using money on bettering existing ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15693430657 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4757898546 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481751824818 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.6100704284 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.692307692 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124322521749 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560410136846 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822987079653 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132194854116 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10781069735 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.