Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
it is believed that government should spend on all type of public transport systems to enrich the experience and make a safe way to the people. it will be good to have government put their expenditure more on railways than roads.This essay will argue why government have to spend money less often on roads and not railways.
While many agree repairing roads frequently will have righteous effects, because regularly monitoring roads and giving a patch work or a complete repair revolves around the public money. it is mesmerizing to see the development of goods and services via road system has increased over recent periods as it results a mammoth growth in way of product consumptions. for instinct, as per recent survey the delivery speed of new car has been hiked by 32 percent. Irrespective of cost considerations, roads are of great use and government can spend money on same
Although roadways are comfortable, smooth, it is not much cost efficient and safe comparing with the railway system. apparently roadways may result in increasing overall taxes. it would hold less penny under government pockets to repair train or railway tracks rather than the road system and individual trucks, in a recent short survey on transportation, it is surprisingly released that it would cost 43 percent less to cover a car delivery in train rather than the lorry, so with out any dilemma, categorically a predominant decision would be supporting government services towards the railways.
To recapitulate, this essay discussed and acknowledges on repairing roads and my opinion on why it is more effective to have government spending more expenses on railways more than pavements
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is believed that government should spen...
^^
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ence and make a safe way to the people. it will be good to have government put the...
^^
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...expenditure more on railways than roads.This essay will argue why government have to...
^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...epair revolves around the public money. it is mesmerizing to see the development o...
^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... growth in way of product consumptions. for instinct, as per recent survey the deli...
^^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Apparently
...safe comparing with the railway system. apparently roadways may result in increasing overa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...may result in increasing overall taxes. it would hold less penny under government ...
^^
Line 9, column 479, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...very in train rather than the lorry, so with out any dilemma, categorically a predominan...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18681318681 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95076260647 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575091575092 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.0344588361 49.4020404114 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.333333333 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22944066826 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833526555498 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677080613389 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140181785272 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483245199004 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.