There is a debate whether country should use money on building new rapid train railway lines or bettering current public transportation. I completely agree with the latter view because of several reasons.
On the one hand, rapid train is advantageous in overcoming traffic congestion problem. This is because rapid train has swift speed and operates in special railway lines which makes its passengers to arrive earlier than before. Therefore, spending money on building new rapid train railway lines will support more rapid trains to operate. The more rapid trains that operate, the less traffic congestion will occur. However, rapid train has expensive fare which will make people to be reluctant to switch from their private vehicles. Finally, traffic congestion problem will not be overcome by the existence of more rapid trains.
On the other hand, public transportation also has potential in overcoming traffic jam problem. By bettering current public transportation, people will feel more comfortable and safe in riding them. Moreover, public transportation such as Bus and MRT usually have affordable fares, which make people to be willing to switch from their personal vehicles. Thus, using money for bettering public transportation can help overcoming traffic congestion problem.
In conclusion, using money for constructing new rapid train railways is good because rapid train is good in overcoming traffic jam problem. However, because it has expensive fare which makes people reluctant to switch from their private vehicles, I completely agree that it is better to spend the money for bettering current public transportation which have more affordable fares.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to overcome' or 'overcome'.
Suggestion: to overcome; overcome
...ettering public transportation can help overcoming traffic congestion problem. In concl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56640625 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79781048863 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4765625 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8964345081 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224048084318 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947375397378 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659417709545 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167140491349 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026221227678 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.