Information is something essential in our life. Some people opine that sharing a lot of information is great, while others think that information should be protected. I completely agree with both views because of several reasons.
On the one side, sharing a lot of information is important because there are processes which need information to be done correctly. If someone does not want to share information that he has to other people whom we work with, their work will not be completed. For instance, a boss has an information about solving a business case from his former colleagues. Because his current employees need those information to solve company's problem, he shares that information to them. As a result, the boss and his employees successfully solve company's problem.
On the other side, protecting information is necessary because some information are not obtained easily. Thus, this kind of information should be shared carefully to protect its value and importance. Moreover, it will also appreciate the owner who found this information. For example, a researcher did a research about the impact of employee compensation on working performance which took Canadian employees as the samples. Because this type of research is still rare, he wants to protect his information by registering his research as paid-journal type on a repository site. Consequently, only people who really want to access this information will be willing to pay for it so this information will not be spread wastefully.
In conclusion, I agree that sharing a lot of information is important because there are processes which need information to be done correctly while protecting information is also necessary because some information are not obtained easily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...ues. Because his current employees need those information to solve companys problem, he shares th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ormation. For example, a researcher did a research about the impact of employee compensati...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, moreover, really, so, still, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34296028881 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09193078363 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498194945848 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.487971548 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300707688855 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12036944053 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837253691888 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228440005999 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347496816496 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.