Thanks to the development of technology, high-speed trains have been introduced to the public in the modern society. Some people argue that it is necessary to invest huge amount of money on facilities for this new type of trains, however other people insist that rather than high-speed trains, existing public transport should be invested that amount of money. I will deal with my own opinions after treating both of views.
To begin with, very fast trains are valuable enough to be invested since various people from different fields can benefit from them. Firstly, people who have to commute for a long distance to a different city everyday would shorten their commuting time significantly by taking a high-speed train. Reduced moving time would cause the increase in their quality of life. Secondly, workers in delivering goods industry would improve their work efficiency if very fast trains are constructed with enough amount of money. For example, if someone had to convey their goods to sell to other cities with a limitation of time, a state of the art train would be the most safe and fastest option for them to complete their work. Therefore, In the regard that this new trains would fasten the way we live and work, they have to be constructed even with large sums of money.
On the other hand, it is also true that there are necessities to improve existing public transport. The main reason of improving public transport is the concern for safety. In some countries, old public transports are causing many safety problems such as broken escalators. Since they might result in the serious incidents among people who take transport, financial support is needed to repair the old facilities. Furthermore, facilities for transports have significant sanitary problem in some countries. For instance, the trains in New York are famous for dirty and smelly platforms and it is evident that certain amount of money must be spent on improving their sanitary status. Hence, since there are some public transports which need financial support, it is not right to invest this money on high-speed trains.
In my opinion, if any existing public transport has problems to be solved with large sums of money, improving that existing public transport should be prior to building railways for very fast trains. Otherwise, it seems to me that investment on high-speed trains would be the good choice resulting in various advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...for a long distance to a different city everyday would shorten their commuting time sign...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...her cities with a limitation of time, a state of the art train would be the most safe and fastes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 862, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...structed even with large sums of money. On the other hand, it is also true that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2037.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0925 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57763336221 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8041593831 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.166666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361341713128 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115153228222 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839980818337 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239135934082 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340056636797 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.