Without any doubt, transportation is one of the most important challenges that any government should face around the world. It is argued in some countries whether a large amount of budget should have been allocated on constructing fast train's infrastructures, or the money should spend on existing transportation systems and improve them. This essay will discuss both ideas below.
On the one hand, going forward through the modern technology's world such as fast trains and bring them into the transportation system can improve the quality of trips with a wide variety of features. First of all, quick vehicles can drastically decrease the time of a trip and make it much more efficient than it used to be. For instance, a project had been proposed for the development of Tehran-Mashad (two cities in Iran) railway system. The proposal contained buying very fast trains and to prepare their compatible type of rails. As the result, the journey long decreased form about 15 hours into 6 hours. Besides, with such kinds of facilities, it would be easier or even cheaper for people to travel. However, the amount of money that must invest in this kind of upgrading would be really huge.
On the other hand, investing such budget on the development of existing public transports can affect them in positive ways. Firstly, all vehicles could be renewed and also the number of them can saw a rose and it would be easier for citizens to using them. Furthermore, transportation infrastructures like as roads, highways and even aerial system would be developed with an efficient budget. Having said that, focusing on what is already existed and neglecting the future demands can cause serious transportation problem in future.
All in all, although it is necessary to renew existing facilities, in my opinion it is more crucial to have an idea about the future transportation needs and investing on the infrustructures of fast trains could be a wiser decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...an cause serious transportation problem in future. All in all, although it is necessar...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, however, really, so, for instance, kind of, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06501547988 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91507729268 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572755417957 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0482433924 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.066666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220877321169 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682457854108 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062059244599 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131956467238 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485703639736 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.