In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
us">People often argue that the transport expenditure should use on either building faster trains or designing public transport from city to city. personally, I believe that investing money on public transport may be more effective.
us">There are several reasons why I believe that investing the public transport would be better. Firstly, there are a lot of ways for us to transport with nearby. A personal example of this statement would be the fact that we may choose a bus, train or even plane as long as we have to go, Shen Zhen, the city near hong kong. These methods may be fast as well as could be late, according to your decision for what transportation method do you want. we can clearly see that the transport methods between cities are not lacked. Thus, the suggestion of establishing a faster railway line may not necessary.
us">On the other hand, the reason to recommend investing existing public transport is that the circumstance of public transportation is overloaded. Every day in hong kong, residents who back to the office by taking public transport would certainly be crowded in some mtr transferring station such as Admiralty or Kowloon Tong. As though the signal system of the mtr train is faulted, the transport method of employees may be reduced and the situation of the bus would be more crowded. Hence, the above facts reflect the situation that the government should focus the lack of transportation seriously, for instance, the money can invest for mtr company, to add the frequency of the trains as far as strengthening the signal system to prevent the sudden error occurs.
us">To sum up, the emergency of strengthening transportation system is higher than constructing a railway as the factor of overload.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Us&apos
us'>People often argue that the transport ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
...ing public transport from city to city. personally, I believe that investing money on publ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Us&apos
...ublic transport may be more effective. us'>There are several reasons why I bel...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...what transportation method do you want. we can clearly see that the transport meth...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Us&apos
...faster railway line may not necessary. us'>On the other hand, the reason to re...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Us&apos
...m to prevent the sudden error occurs. us'>To sum up, the emergency of strengt...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, may, so, then, thus, well, for instance, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11379310345 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07764174585 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558620689655 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5686046476 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.076923077 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254880465073 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975352739085 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403236446661 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161064779833 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448094958868 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.