In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th

People often argue that they should use the transport expenditure on either building faster trains or designing public transport from city to city. Personally, I believe that investing money on public transport may be more effective.
There are several reasons I believe that investing public transport would be better. First, there are a lot of ways for us to transport nearby. A personal example of this statement would be the fact we may choose a bus, train or even plane as long as we have to go, Chen Zhan, the city near Hong Kong. These methods may be fast and could be late, according to your decision for what transportation method do you want. We can clearly see that we do not lack the transport methods between cities. Thus, the suggestion of establishing a faster railway line may be unnecessary.
The reason to recommend investing in existing public transport is that the circumstance of public transportation is overloaded. Every day in Hong Kong, residents who back to the office by taking public transport would certainly be crowded in some metro transferring station such as Admiralty or Kowloon Tong. As though the signal system of the metro train is faulty, we may reduce the transport time of employees and the situation of the bus would be more crowded. Hence, the above facts reflect the situation that the government should focus the lack of transportation seriously, for instance, the money can invest for metro company, to add the frequency of the trains as far as strengthening the signal system to prevent the sudden errors.
To sum up, the emergency of strengthening transportation system is higher than constructing a railway as the factor of overload.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, may, so, then, thus, for instance, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05017921147 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94986216148 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551971326165 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8136162895 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.384615385 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268443033634 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104742724615 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405667891987 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167280295245 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03751966483 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.