The number of people working online from home has grown in some countries. What advantages and disadvantages can come of this trend
Telecommuting has been gaining in popularity in recent decades due to its substantial impacts on people’s work. Although the advantages associated with this pattern can be pronounced, there still exists many limitations.
On the one hand, there are a number of benefits of working from home. First, Since telecommuting requires no physical travels costing unnecessary time money and effort, people can save an enormous amount of money spent on transportation services. Subsequently, In addition to money savings, this working mode also acts as a deterrent for the emission of exhausted fumes into the atmosphere. Second, Working from home is invariably a comfortable working environment without the existence of office politics from other colleagues. This will boost the working productivity and efficiency of tele-workers, resulting in desirable working output.
On the other hand, tele-work is not without downsides. First, working from home can remarkably reduce interaction and experience exchange among co-workers in the company. This will lead to the loss of some fundamental skills to climb the promotion ladder, especially team working and leadership. In addition, telecommuting usually requires many electronic devices with good Internet connection to guarantee the working stability. It is implied that those in poverty stricken areas in some developing countries cannot relish this advanced working mode on the grounds that these high-tech gadgets are unaffordable.
In conclusion, given the clear advantages working from home has, there are still a vast number of limitations. However, by acknowledging these downsides, the employers and workers can find ways to dodge them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...without the existence of office politics from other colleagues. This will boost t...
^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...adgets are unaffordable. In conclusion, given the clear advantages working from ...
^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f limitations. However, by acknowledging these downsides, the employers and worke...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76892430279 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12525867566 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629482071713 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6002915439 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.428571429 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320117037282 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111359515544 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633947829192 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1914179769 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035011090361 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.