In modern days, the population of the world live longer and level of life has increased. That is why governments have a dilemma "should they improved their medical system or not?". I think, if governments develop medicine it will bring many benefits than harm.
First of all, health care improvement will lead to better people well-being. It is mean that citizens will have fewer diseases and illnesses. Also, it will fix problem with work, because people will take less time for treatment and more for job. In a result that changes for the better will influence on work productivity, For example, in Japan, car industry increased income on 10 per cent only because they improved the hospitals where their employers go to get treatment.
However, there is one problem from economical standpoint. Companies and governments should invest large amount of money to develop health care system. Nevertheless, it is not a big problem because investment will returned in the future. For example, monetarily part will come back with taxes from medical insurance or by incomes from treatments.
Another positive point is benefits for medical science. Doctors and scientists will have possibility make researches in problem areas like cancer. That development can help invent drugs against AIDS and leukemia, for example.
Moreover, the better health system country will have the stronger nation will be.
In conclusion, as it is shown, improvement in a medical system sooner or later will give a lot of benefits. I sure that governments should decide to fund medicine for the healthiest future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'return'
Suggestion: return
...t a big problem because investment will returned in the future. For example, monetarily ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76318527629 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61328125 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1675342945 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0588235294 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0588235294 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121313480023 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445315636827 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404069907254 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.064642790117 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480304737445 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.