On the one hand, some scientists predict that modern machines will increase the unemployment rate substantially,
People usually hold opposing point of views about future repercussions of artificial intelligence. Pessimists often claim that the increasing intelligence of machinery could pose a threat to the human race. However, I do not believe with the above contention and believe that progress in this sector brings more benefits to society than potential risks they may create.
On the one hand, some scientists predict that modern machines will increase the unemployment rate substantially, which has actually already taken place in may sectors. This argument emphasizes that many companies, especially in the manufacturing sector, will supersede blue-collar workers by sophisticated machines and techniques to improve labor productivity. As a result, a great many traditional laborers become unemployed or have to reluctantly switch to other non-professional jobs. The transportation industry can be taken as a typical example. Many specialists believe that self-driving vehicles will cause redundancies in driving jobs such as bus, lorry or taxi drivers. This partly illustrates negative implications of scientific and technological developments for social life.
Despite the downsides mentioned above, I believe that scientific and technical breakthroughs play an essential role in modern society. One should bear in mind the fact that modern machinery can enable humans to carry out many tasks more quickly, effectively and accurately than before. More importantly, they can replace humans in many jobs beyond our ability. For example, robots have become increasingly important to daunting and high-risk undertakings such as ocean exploration, lifting heavy objects at construction sites or investigating in toxic environments. Needless to say, the development of artificial intelligence will only improve our life in many different ways.
Although may people claim that potential dangers of intelligent machines should not be overlooked, it is my opinion that the advantages they generate undoubtedly outweigh the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-19 | hungnguyen123 | 89 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- As a result many believe camera surveillance is inadvisable and privacy is one of the most important rights which must be respected in this civilised world 78
- The second reason why I advocate this trend is that the single child will receive adequate care and home schooling 84
- The use of surveillance cameras to deter criminals is becoming increasingly prevalent in many large cities all over the world 78
- I disagree with this viewpoint and believe that the imposition of taxes on imported food is of paramount importance to the agricultural sector of a country 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 657, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...elligence will only improve our life in many different ways. Although may people claim that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, look, may, so, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92517006803 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30741695214 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663265306122 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.348061892 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.133333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227036389851 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668666455789 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141795482566 0.0667982634062 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109949312767 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111898450801 0.056905535591 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.