Only government action can solve housing shortages in big cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Providing accommodation has always been a controversial debate since industrialization era. One may consider government as a responsible for providing house for the society while others disagree with this statement. I completely agree with the claim and I will explain my reasons.
One of the main duties of government is providing house for all the society in reasonable price by taking advantage of different policies. In term of financial issues, authority may reduce tax in constructing house to encourage entrepreneurs to be more active in this industry. The money would be attracted by activities which could earn more benefits. In order to limit abuse of the situation, parliament may introduce laws to restrict all exploitation. As an example, building constructors may avoid selling their houses to increase the cost. However, government could impose fine for empty houses to alleviate any consequences.
On the other hand, one may claim that government could not overcome housing shortage in construction companies do not follow according government’s policy. In order to reject this claim it should be noted that government has authority and reasonable budget to cancel out any detrimental activities. For instance in this case, even if tax policy could not tempt constructors to work in housing field, government could invite foreign constructors for this purpose.
According to aforementioned reasons, government by enforcing law and incentive actions could entice industrialists to invest in housing industries in metropolitan cities and restrict any misuse of rules. Thus, I totally agree that government actions play a vital role in addressing housing scarcity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57421875 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23152189605 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59765625 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.258852517 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.928571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192731328321 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688803049222 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593745862539 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128251940133 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049551284887 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.