The only reason to work hard is to earn money. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that the only purpose to give 100% in work is to gain money. In this essay, I will explain why I disagree with this statement. Firstly, I will consider the impact of working hard for self-worth and secondly, I will explain how working with focus helps other people around us.
To begin with, I feel like working hard is important to improve our skills and knowledge as much as earning financial gain. People who are devoted to their work would have a chance to boost their abilities and gain new knowledge. Furthermore, by achieving and completing work well, they will gain a feeling of self-worth. In our modern times, many adults battle with mental problems related to self-respect. I think working hard can have a positive effect on this. Also, for some people, their job is a way to express themselves. Artists and authors are willing to work harder because they are passionate about their job. And they feel fulfilled doing it.
In addition to this, by working with the focus we can help others with their problems too. I believe helping people is a very noble act. For instance, after the Covid-19 outbreak, we can see doctors are working much harder than ever before and their work is saving thousands of peoples' lives. Also, with the financial gain from our effort, we would have more to give to charity. Hence, we would be making peoples lives better.
To sum up, I believe there are many reasons why people should work hard in their jobs. I disagree that money is the sole purpose for it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
- The internet has transformed how we interact and live in many great ways but also created problems that didn t exist before What are the problems and solutions 56
- Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent developments ever will To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and the present 73
- In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- Tourism is encouraged in many countries Does tourism bring more advantages or disadvantages to a country 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i feel, i think, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67910447761 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34394895012 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544776119403 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9183426671 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.6666666667 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8888888889 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181596797699 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627339799273 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053452778364 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133777329472 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588908538208 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.0946893788 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.3001002004 57% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.27 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.